Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05445
Original file (BC 2013 05445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05445
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents on 3 Apr 10. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He applied for TEB on 3 Apr 10 per the Post-9/11 TEB guidance provided at that time, but was unjustly denied his benefit.  After applying, he departed for a new assignment on 5 Apr 10.  The Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) told him that on 6 Apr 10, they acknowledged his email and notified him further action on his application was needed.  If he had received the notification, he would have complied with AFPC’s additional guidance, however, he never received their 6 Apr 10 e-mail.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 8 Sep 09, the applicant reenlisted for a period of five years and one month.  Since the applicant served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, he was entitled to Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in his own right and was otherwise eligible to transfer said benefits to his dependents, provided he met the prescribed active duty service commitment (ADSC) of four years.  Had the applicant successfully transferred his benefits on the date requested (3 Apr 10), he would have incurred a four-year ADSC requiring him to serve until at least 2 Apr 14.

On 31 Jan 14, the applicant was released from active duty and retired, effective 1 Feb 14.  He was credited with 20 years and 7 days of total active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request.  For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children.  Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents (Title 38, USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)).  Title, 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(f)(1) adds that the transfer of such entitlement can only be done while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.

During the period 1 Aug 09 through 1 Jul 10, there was no “banner” in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) which allowed members to verify their email address and phone number prior to continuing.  It is plausible the member did not receive the initial notification.  Additionally, Maxwell Air Force Base, AL, had not converted to Air Force “Email for Life,” which meant that any communication sent by the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) would not have been received by the member.  Based on this information, the AFBCMR should approve the application, with a TEB effective date of 3 Apr 10.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSIT and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.  We note that the applicant retired just two months prior to fulfilling the active duty service commitment (ADSC) he would have incurred had he transferred his benefits on the date requested.  Nonetheless, given the apparent confusion surrounding the applicant’s election, we believe that it is in the interest of justice to provide the requested relief and also correct the record to reflect that any unserved part of the ADSC was waived.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 3 April 2010 he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits, and competent authority waived any remaining associated active duty service commitment.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05445 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 18 Dec 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 14.

						









3





FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592

    Original file (BC 2013 04592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05609

    Original file (BC 2013 05609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05609 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 8 Feb 10, the original date of his TEB application submission. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03671

    Original file (BC 2013 03671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03671 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The effective date of his Post-9/11 Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) election and his associated four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) begin on 16 Mar 10. Had the applicant completed his election to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02712

    Original file (BC-2011-02712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02712 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His transfer of education benefits (TEB) and active duty service commitment (ADSC) for the TEB be revoked. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05141

    Original file (BC 2013 05141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05141 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01117

    Original file (BC 2013 01117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00790

    Original file (BC 2014 00790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Without a signed SOU, the TFSC personnel cannot determine if the member accepts the four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05383

    Original file (BC 2013 05383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. THE BOARD DETERMINES...